Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Broderick et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03678
Plaintiff:
John J. Broderick and Quishi Sha
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 5514 Debt Collection Act of 1982
Rahman v. Balanos et al
as 1:2023cv08168
Plaintiff:
Sha-Heed Rahman
Defendant:
Capt. Balanos, Asenceau and Capt. Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram-Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01022
Plaintiff:
Kahari Sha-mel Ingram-Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04281
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Farrow v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06130
Plaintiff:
Ra-Sha Perry Ray Farrow
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
Sharpe v. Moss et al
as 1:2020cv00386
Defendant:
Ms. Marlene Melo, Ramel Bain, Chekira Sharpe and others
Plaintiff:
Sheaia F. Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sharpe v. Moss et al
as 1:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Ms. Marlene Melo, Ramel Bain, Chekira Sharpe and others
Plaintiff:
Sheaia F. Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
