Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Amaral, et al. v. Post Falls Highway District
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Susan Amaral and Shane P Amaral
Defendant:
Post Falls Highway District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bartholomew v. Kralik, et al.
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Darin L. Bartholomew
Defendant:
Dusty Kralik, Shane Grady, Todd McDevitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tijerina v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jessica-Ann Tijerina
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Jared Smith, Byron Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Anderson v. Dowell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Devon Joseph Anderson
Defendant:
Ashley Dowell, Shane Saxton, Conley Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Zamora, et al.
as 1:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Marvin Shane Bishop
Defendant:
Carlos Zamora and New Empire LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hoak v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Larry M. Hoak
Defendant:
Tyrell Davis, Centurion Health Care, Corizon Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Hook v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Ronald Van Hook
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Judge Beaver, Judge McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoak v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Larry M Hoak
Defendant:
Tyrell Davis, Rebeka Haggard, Sumer Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atencio, et al. v. City of Nampa, et al.
as 1:2022cv00374
Plaintiff:
A. M., Amanda Renee Atencio, I. M. and others
Defendant:
City of Nampa, Canyon County, Joe Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaffer v. Front Line EMS LLC
as 1:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Mr. Shane Chaffer and Shane Chaffer
Defendant:
Front Line EMS LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
