Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Joseph Nelson v. James Atterberry, et al
as 11-1058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH JOHN NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES ATTERBERRY, SHAREE BOOKER, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden and others
Nelson #451880 v. Atterberry et al
as 1:2010cv01010
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Nelson #451880
Defendant:
James Atterberry, Sharee Booker, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Harrell v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2009cv10132
Plaintiff:
Joe Harrell
Defendant:
Jenkins, Byrd, Donna J Sperry and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Petros #378529 v. Sampson et al
as 2:2008cv00293
Plaintiff:
Harry Steve Petros #378529
Defendant:
Barbra Sampson, James Atterberry and Sharee Booker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Sampson et al
as 2:2008cv15060
Plaintiff:
Keith Lewis
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, Miguel Berrios, James Atterberry and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Reed v. Sampson et al
as 1:2008cv14380
Plaintiff:
Henry Reed
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, Miguel Berrios, James Atterberry and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Smith v. Sampson et al
as 2:2008cv14002
Plaintiff:
Brady Smith
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, Miguel Berrios, James Atterberry and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Kenneth Foster v. Sharee Booker
as 08-1626
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNETH FOSTER
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAREE BOOKER, in his/her official capacity as member of the Michigan Parole Board, et al.
Kenneth Foster, et al v. Sharee Booker
as 08-1478
Plaintiff:
KENNETH FOSTER, et al.
Appellant:
KENNETH M. WOJNICZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAREE BOOKER, in his/her official capacity as member of the Michigan Parole Board, et al.
Kenneth Foster, et al v. John Rubitschun, et al
as 08-1372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH FOSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAREE BOOKER, in his/her official capacity as member of the Michigan Parole Board, et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
