Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Sewell v. Warden
as 8:2011cv00614
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel E. Sewell
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer, Bobby P. Shearin, Richard R. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Miles v. Gary Maynard
as 10-7379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN J. MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MAYNARD, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services, J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner, SHARON BAUCOM, Medical Director and others
Buxton v. Baucom
as 8:2010cv02211
Plaintiff:
Randy Buxton
Defendant:
Sharon Baucom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagana v. Baucom
as 8:2010cv01032
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lagana
Defendant:
Sharon Baucom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Miles v. Gary Maynard
as 10-6611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN J. MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MAYNARD, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services, J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner, SHARON BAUCOM, Medical Director and others
Calvin Bradshaw v. Walter Wirsching
as 10-6231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN BRADSHAW
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER WIRSCHING, Director, SHARON BAUCOM, M.D., ELEANOR BOULES, R.N. Manager and others
Bradshaw v. Ulrsching et al
as 8:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
Calvin Bradshaw
Defendant:
Walter Ulrsching, Sharon Baucom, Eleanor Boules and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bradshaw v. Maynard et al
as 8:2007cv02578
Plaintiff:
Calvin Bradshaw
Defendant:
Gary Maynard, John A. Rowley, Richard J. Carham, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Maynard et al
as 8:2007cv02085
Plaintiff:
Calvin Bradshaw
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, John A. Rowley, Richard J. Garham, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Wirsching et al
as 8:2007cv01271
Plaintiff:
Calvin Bradshaw
Defendant:
Walt Wirsching, Sharon Baucom, Eleanor Boulies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
