Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 14-8003
Petitioner:
MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Respondent:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LIMITED, HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION and others
Rockwell Automation Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00369
Plaintiff:
Rockwell Automation Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
LG Display Company, Limited, et al v. Lisa Madigan
as 11-8017
Petitioner:
LG DISPLAY COMPANY, LIMITED, CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION, formerly known as CHI EMI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION, EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. Sharp Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv06763
Plaintiff:
Intellect Wireless, Inc.
Defendant:
Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
State Of Illinois v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv05720
Plaintiff:
State Of Illinois
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Innolux Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv06610
Plaintiff:
Motorola, Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sharp Electronics Corporation v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co, et al
as 09-1145
Plaintiff:
SANDRA RUDZINSKI
Defendant - Appellant:
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Sharp Electronics v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co
as 08-2959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv04146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mitt v. LG Philips LCD Company Ltd et al
as 2:2007cv00151
Plaintiff:
Toomas P Mitt, Toomas P Mitt and Toomas P Mitt
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Company Ltd, LG Philips LCD America Inc, LG Electronics Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
