Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Cressotti et al v. Cohill Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01472
Plaintiff:
Lino Cressotti, Dave Trumbel, Charles Powers and others
Defendant:
Cohill Contracting, Inc., Firestoppers, Inc. and On-Time Insulation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw v. Ryan's Restaurant Group Inc
as 6:2007cv04026
Plaintiff:
Alan Shaw
Defendant:
Ryan's Restaurant Group Inc and Ryan's Restaurant Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Rawlings et al v. Rabco Insulation, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02240
Plaintiff:
Carroll E. Rawlings, Carroll E. Rawlings, Alan Stortzum and others
Defendant:
Rabco Insulation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rawlings et al v. Chesapeake Firestop Products, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02211
Plaintiff:
Carroll E. Rawlings, Carroll E. Rawlings, Alan Stortzum and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Firestop Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Shaw v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 6:2007cv02768
Plaintiff:
Emory Shaw
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Adams et al v.The City of Raleigh, North Carolina
as 5:2007cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jerry nmi Adams, Jerry nmi Adams, Nebraska Baker and others
Defendant:
Raleigh, City of, N. C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shaw v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 6:2007cv01418
Plaintiff:
Alan Shaw
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rodgers v. Savings First Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2003cv02984
Plaintiff:
Leslie F. Rodgers, Leslie F. Rogers, Mark Anthony Bainbridge and others
Defendant:
Savings First Mortgage, LLC, Harry Korotki, David Barrish and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
