Cases 1 - 10 of 115
THOMAS v. MCGRATH et al
as 5:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
WILLIE VINCENT TIMOTHY THOMAS, II
Defendant:
LYLE MCGRATH, KRISTAIN SHAW, LUIS HERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. James et al
as 2:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
Aaron R. Shaw
Defendant:
Mr. James, Duley, C. Ampey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCOY v. MCNEILL et al
as 5:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SYLVESTER MCCOY, JR
Defendant:
RAYMOND MCNEILL, KRISTAIN SHAW, JOSHUA GWYN SEIGLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Moran et al
as 2:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
Aaron R. Shaw
Defendant:
William Moran, Brittany C. Livingston, Hon. Don T. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNT v. BASFORD et al
as 5:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL H HUNT
Defendant:
LARRY BASFORD, PANAMA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, KRISTAIN SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Shaw
as 2:2022cv14278
Plaintiff:
Garrett Foster, Jr
Defendant:
Wolf Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00877
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Shaw
Defendant:
Grady C. Judd, Jr., Don K. Murry, Corizan Health Care Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman, Joshua M. Shaw, Charles Johnson and others
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Howard L. Dimmig, II, Ita M. Neymotin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv21717
Defendant:
J. Dawson, J-Pay Corporation, Warden D. Snider and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Attorney General
as 1:2021cv21337
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Rolando Shaw
Defendant:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
