Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv06480
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Venettozzi et al
as 9:2014cv01215
Plaintiff:
Shawn Green
Defendant:
D. Venettozzi, C.J. Koenigsmann, R. Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Greene
as 12-1671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shawn Green
Defendant:
Gary Greene, David A. Carpenter, R. Eastman, Captain and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Darwin LaClair, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Estate of Richard W. Potter, FKA Richard W. Potter, Winchell, Sergeant and others
Green v. McLaughin
as 11-5451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shawn Green
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth McLaughin, Inspector General, Donald Selsky, Thomas G. Eagen and others
Green v. Fischer
as 6:2011cv06063
Plaintiff:
Shawn Green
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Lucien LeClaire, Jr., Karen Bellamy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Bradt
as 6:2010cv06662
Petitioner:
Shawn Green
Respondent:
Mark L. Bradt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Central Office Review
as 10-3073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shawn Green
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas G. Eagen, K. Bellamy, Kenneth McLaughlin and others
Green v. Selsky
as 10-944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shawn Green
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Selsky, former Director, Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program, James Conway, Superintendent Attica Correctional Facility, Captain DeAngelo and others
Green v. Selsky et al
as 6:2009cv06392
Plaintiff:
Shawn Green
Defendant:
Donald Selsky, James Conway, DeAngelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Central Office Review Committee et al
as 1:2007cv04536
Plaintiff:
Shawn Green
Defendant:
Central Office Review Committee, Thomas G. Eagen, K. Bellamy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
