Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Talbot v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-1280
Plaintiff:
SHAWN TALBOT, of the family Rice
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, doing business as IRS Agent John Does 1-100, DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, doing business as David A. Hubbert and others
Shawn Talbot v. Louis Johnson, et al
as 22-15985
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN TALBOT
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS ERIC JOHNSON, DANIEL BOGDENS and JOHN GREGORY DAMM
Talbot v. Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv02112
Plaintiff:
Shawn Talbot
Defendant:
Louis Eric Johnson, Daniel Bogdens, John Gregory Damm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shawn Talbot Rice et al v. United States et al
as 5:2020cv00079
Respondent:
United States, William Barr, United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Shawn Talbot Rice
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Samuel Donaghe v. Patrisha Lashway, et al
as 17-35919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL WILLIAM DONAGHE
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRISHA LASHWAY, JOHN CLAYTON, WILLIAM VAN HOOK and others
Donaghe v. Lashway et al
as 3:2016cv05973
Plaintiff:
Sam Donaghe
Defendant:
Patrisha Lashway, Kevin Quigley, John Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Urlacher v. Quigley et al
as 3:2016cv05912
Plaintiff:
Charles RP Urlacher
Defendant:
Kevin Quigley, Patrisha Lashway, John Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Shawn Rice
as 13-10186
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWN RICE, AKA Shawn Talbot Rice
USA v. Shawn Rice
as 13-10152
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWN RICE, AKA Shawn Talbot Rice
Rice v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv02044
Petitioner:
Shawn Talbot Rice
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
