Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Walker et al
as 2:2013cv00400
Plaintiff:
Antonio Shawn Williams
Defendant:
Ebony Marie Walker and Barron S Coe, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Alabama et al
as 4:2011cv03190
Plaintiff:
Antonio Shawn Williams
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Ebony Marie Walker, Baron Coe, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Thomas et al
as 2:2011cv00505
Petitioner:
Antonio Shawn Williams
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Thomas et al
as 2:2009cv02140
Petitioner:
Antonio Shawn Williams
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Coe
as 4:2007cv02336
Plaintiff:
Antonio Shawn Williams
Defendant:
Barron Coe, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Department of Human Resources et al
as 4:2007cv02337
Plaintiff:
Antonio Shawn Williams
Defendant:
Department of Human Resources, Joanna Stone, Lisa Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Walker et al
as 4:2007cv02338
Plaintiff:
Antonio Shawn Williams
Defendant:
Ebony Marie Walker and James Lee Walker, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Walker et al
as 4:2007cv01808
Plaintiff:
Antonio Shawn Williams
Defendant:
Ebony Walker, James Walker, Sr. and James Walker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. D.H.R. et al
as 4:2007cv01764
Plaintiff:
Antonio Shawn Williams
Defendant:
D.H.R., Lisa Patterson, Joanna Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. D.H.R.
as 2:2007cv01696
Plaintiff:
Antonio Shawn Williams
Defendant:
D.H.R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
