Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Woodward v. Davis et al
as 9:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Defendant:
Davis, G.R. Munden, Paige and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodward v. White et al
as 1:2019cv10281
Defendant:
Elon Harpaz, Cyrus Vance, Jr., Renee A. White and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Ali
as 19-2612
Defendant:
Miller, Deputy Superintendent of Security; Coxsackie Correctional Facility, CO Baldwin, Law, C.O. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Ali, Muslim Chaplain; Coxsackie Correctional Facility and Stevenson, C.O.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shawn Woodward
Woodward v. Lytle
as 19-2095
Defendant / Appellee:
Correctional Lieutenant Norman Jones, Cape Vincent Correctional Facility, FKA N. Jones, Sean Dawley, Correctional Officer; Cape Vincent Correctional Facility, FKA Darley, Scott Lytle, Correctional Officer; Cape Vincent Correctional Facility, FKA Lytle and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shawn Woodward
Woodward v. Michaloski et al
as 1:2018cv01024
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Defendant:
F. A. Harrington, D. M. Stickel, D'Agostino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Doe #1 et al
as 9:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Defendant:
John Doe #1 , John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Holtzman et al
as 1:2016cv01023
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Defendant:
Holtzman, E. Rice, R. E. Donley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Lytle et al
as 9:2016cv01174
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Defendant:
Lytle, Darley, D.C. Docteur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Annucci
as 1:2015cv00885
Petitioner:
Shawn Woodward
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodward v. Afify et al
as 1:2014cv00856
Defendant:
Afify, Raffty, T. Sewalt and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
