Cases 31 - 40 of 65
SHELTON v. MAIN et al
as 2:2014cv01635
Petitioner:
RAYMOND SHELTON
Respondent:
MERIL MAIN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and DAVID L. DACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shelton v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv01469
Plaintiff:
Norman N. Shelton
Defendant:
Baker, Francis Fasciana, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Norman Shelton v. S. Thoma
as 13-2409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN SHELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
S. E. THOMAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Norman Shelton v. T. Crawley, et al
as 13-2080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN SHELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
T. CRAWLEY
Matan Shelton v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 13-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATAN SHELTON
Debtor - Appellee:
GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner, N.J. Dept. of Corr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI, Administratix, N.J. State Prison and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Norman Shelton v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 13-1586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN SHELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, Assistant Director, WARDEN THOMAS, NORWOOD, Regional Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00475
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shelton v. Thomas et al
as 3:2013cv00404
Petitioner:
Norman N. Shelton
Respondent:
S. E. Thomas and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shelton v. Samuels et al
as 3:2013cv00220
Petitioner:
Norman N Shelton
Respondent:
Charles Samuels , Thomas , Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shelton v. Jordan et al
as 3:2013cv00059
Petitioner:
Norman Shelton
Respondent:
A. Jordan, J. E. Thomas, Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
