Cases 31 - 39 of 39
USA v. 51 Parcels of Property et al
as 3:2010cv00774
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
51 Parcels of Property, 197-199 Bassett St, 25-29 Batter Terrace and others
Claimant:
Menachem Levitin, 161 Edgewood LLC, ADM Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Casertano et al v. Kerwin et al
as 3:2009cv01853
Plaintiff:
Loren Casertano and Kim-Marie Casertano
Defendant:
John Kerwin, Joel W. Hurliman and City of Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phoenix Housing of Shelton, LLC v. Feegan et al
as 3:2008cv01595
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Housing of Shelton, LLC
Defendant:
James Feegan, Michael Julian, Alvin O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Shelton
as 3:2008cv00919
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
City of Shelton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baker & Taylor Inc et al v. AlphaCraze.com Corp et al
as 3:2007cv01851
Plaintiff:
Baker & Taylor Inc, Baker & Taylor Inc, Baker & Taylor Inc and others
Defendant:
AlphaCraze.com Corp, Allan R. Avery, Laura M. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chisholm v. Ramia et al
as 3:2007cv01691
Plaintiff:
Annemarie Chisholm
Defendant:
Donald Ramia and Shelton Bd of Ed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01514
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
West, et al v. Manson, et al
as 2:1983cv00366
Plaintiff:
Valerie West , Passion Rayne West , Victoria Bellavita and others
Defendant:
John R. Manson , Marie Cerino and Mark Marcus
Movant:
James A. Harnage
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
