Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Focht v. Gillies et al
as 3:2012cv05991
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Focht
Defendant:
James Gillies, Scott Schope, I. Stephons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Blevins et al v. Mason County et al
as 3:2012cv05451
Plaintiff:
Harrison Blevins and Thomas Blevins
Defendant:
Mason County and Shelton School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peralta v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv00679
Plaintiff:
Isaias Peralta
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Regional Justice Center, Shelton Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eagle Healthcare, Inc. et al v. Dreyfus et al
as 3:2010cv05470
Plaintiff:
Eagle Healthcare, Inc. , Evergreen Washington Healthcare Frontier, L.L.C. , Evergreen Washington Healthcare Americana, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Susan N. Dreyfus and Kathy Leitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allen et al v. Mason County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2009cv05752
Plaintiff:
Vince Allen and Jami Allen
Defendant:
Mason County Sheriff's Office, Casey Salisbury, Mason County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gravelet-Blondin et al v. Shelton et al
as 2:2009cv01487
Plaintiff:
Donald Gravelet-Blondin, Donald Gravelet-Blondin, Kristi Gravelet-Blondin and others
Defendant:
Jeff Shelton, Carl Whalen and City of Snohomish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashelman v. Shelton Corrections
as 3:2009cv05570
Petitioner:
Perry Ashelman
Respondent:
Shelton Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walter v. Day et al
as 3:2007cv05100
Plaintiff:
Cherri Walter and Cherri Walter
Defendant:
Edward Day, Jane Doe Day, Terry Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
