Cases 1 - 6 of 6
David Gilmour Music Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv00699
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", shiweilin0923, xianshiyantaquaierxiangbaihuobianlidian and others
Plaintiff:
David Gilmour Music Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Beauty Plus Trading Co., Inc. v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Association Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv07008
Plaintiff:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Association Identified on Schedule "A", Beauty Plus Trading Co., Inc. and Harmonyellen
Defendant:
Shenzhen Xinmeifeng Electronic Foreign Trade Co., Ltd., DYHAIR, Yiwu Zoesoul Hair Product Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Crestridge Consulting, Inc. v. Ningbo Superim Shenlong Technologies Co., LTD. et al
as 2:2018cv04682
Plaintiff:
Crestridge Consulting, Inc.
Defendant:
Does, Ningbo Superim Shenlong Technologies Co., LTD. and Yinyi Group
CRESTRIDGE CONSULTING, INC., a California corporation v. NINGBO SUPERIM SHENLONG TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., a Chinese company et al
as 2:2018cv04677
Plaintiff:
CRESTRIDGE CONSULTING, INC., a California corporation
Defendant:
NINGBO SUPERIM SHENLONG TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., a Chinese company and YINYI GROUP, a Chinese company
NYK Stolt Shipholding Inc. v. Shenlong Maritime Pte. Ltd.
as 1:2007cv02930
Plaintiff:
NYK Stolt Shipholding Inc. and NYK Stolt Shipholding Inc.
Defendant:
Shenlong Maritime Pte. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Martin Midstream Partners, LP et al v. Chembulk New Orleans et al
as 1:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
Martin Midstream Partners, LP and Martin Operating Partnership, LP
Defendant:
Chembulk New Orleans, Shenlong Maritime, PTE, LTD, Maruta Industries Co, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
