Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Richard-Allerdyce et al v. Union Institute and University et al
as 1:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
Diane Richard-Allerdyce, Karen Baird, Carol Barrett Sargent and others
Defendant:
Union Institute and University, The Board of Trustees of Union Institute and University, Edgar L Smith, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shepherd v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03299
Plaintiff:
LLEWELLYN SHEPHERD
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Campbell v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
William Campbell
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Hamilton County Board Of Commissioners, Brian Shepherd (#23) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Gregory Shepherd
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whitmore v. AEP Ohio et al
as 2:2021cv05747
Plaintiff:
Robert Whitmore
Defendant:
AEP Ohio and Andrea Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dae Sung Hi Tech Co., Ltd. et al v. Shepherd
as 3:2021cv01495
Plaintiff:
Dae Sung Hi Tech Co., Ltd. and First 2 Market Products, LLC
Defendant:
Mary Shepherd doing business as D&M Sales
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Shepherd v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03357
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lizzie v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00283
Plaintiff:
Lizzie Shepherd
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
