Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SHEPLER v. ELBEL et al
as 2:2016cv01470
Plaintiff:
SHANE LEE SHEPLER
Defendant:
THOMAS ELBEL, DUSTIN MYERS, JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPLER v. DIRAIMO et al
as 1:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
SHANE LEE SHEPLER
Defendant:
DIRAIMO and E. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPLER v. MILLARD et al
as 2:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
SHANE LEE SHEPLER
Defendant:
BRETT MILLARD and WAL-MART CONNECTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPLER v. JEFFERSON COUNTY JAIL BROAD MEMBER et al
as 2:2013cv00521
Plaintiff:
SHANE LEE SHEPLER
Defendant:
JEFFERSON COUNTY JAIL BROAD MEMBER and THOMAS ELBEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Beard et al
as 3:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Blondell Simmons
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Shirley Moore Smeal, D.M. Chamberlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caesar v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00202
Plaintiff:
Florence Caesar
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Beard, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Hartman et al
as 1:2009cv00844
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Hartman, Deputy Shepler, Drebler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Lamas et al
as 1:2009cv00846
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Lamas, Wright, Lt. Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Beard et al
as 1:2009cv00845
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Marirosa Lamas, Jill Shepler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Hill et al
as 1:2009cv00773
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Hill, Robenolt, Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
