Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Rodriguez v. Sherburne County Jail
as 0:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Sherburne County Jail
as 0:2023cv03663
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalil Dodd v. John Doe, et al
as 23-2683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Khalil Demar Dodd
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe, Jane Doe, City of Sherburne and others
Hanes v. Sherburne County Jail et al
as 0:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cameron Hanes
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail, MenD Inc., Joel Brott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maloney v. MEnD Correctional Care et al
as 0:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Maloney, Jr
Defendant:
MEnD Correctional Care, Sherburne County Jail, U.S. Marshall Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dodd v. Doe et al
as 0:2022cv02762
Plaintiff:
Khalil Demar Dodd
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, City of Sherburne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Broussard v. United States, et al
as 22-2783
Petitioner / Appellant:
Aaron Rhy Broussard
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, Sheriff Joel L. Brott, Commander Brian Frank and others
Young v. Sherburne County Jail et al
as 0:2022cv02014
Plaintiff:
LaRon Young
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail and Trinity Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broussard v. United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv02004
Petitioner:
Aaron Rhy Broussard
Respondent:
United States of America, Sheriff Joel L. Brott, Commander Brian Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
