Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Gousie v. Police and Sheriff's Support Alliance
as 1:2024cv11103
Plaintiff:
Steven E Gousie
Defendant:
Police and Sheriff's Support Alliance
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charron v. York County, et al
as 21-1753
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN A. CHARRON
Defendant / Appellee:
YORK COUNTY, WILLIAM L. KING, JR., individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of York County, RACHEL A. HORNING, individually and in her official capacity Deputy Sheriff of York County and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MOSS and ERIC J. PILVELAIT
Interested Party:
KYLE J. MYSKA
Evariste v. Velez
as 21-1454
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER ALEX VELEZ
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL EVARISTE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF
Daggett v. York County, et al
as 21-1374
Defendant / Appellee:
YORK COUNTY, a Municipal Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maine, WILLIAM KING, individually and as Sheriff of York County, TIMOTHY TOWNE, Chief of the Berwick Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS DAGGETT
Evariste v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 21-1272
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF, OFFICER VELEZ and COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL EVARISTE
Small v. Joyce
as 21-1239
Petitioner / Appellant:
IYASSU TAFORI SMALL
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN J. JOYCE and KEVIN J. JOYCE, Sheriff, Cumberland County Jail
In Re: Da Graca, et al
as 20-2117
Interested Party:
OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner:
JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent:
THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Plourde v. US, et al
as 20-1777
Defendant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, MAINE AMERICAN RED CROSS, JOSEPH MAGUIRE, Director of National Intelligence (Retired) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN PLOURDE
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHANIAL JACK, Knox county Sheriff's Department Deputy, BETH ASHCROFT, Office of Program Evaulation and Government Accountability, UNKOWN KNOX COUNTY, SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUV DRIVER and others
Plaintiff:
OFFICER CAVANAUGH FREEPORT MAINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (Rank Unknown)
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party:
JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner:
MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
