Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv18487
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05668
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin v. Lin & Longs Corporation et al
as 0:2023cv62114
Plaintiff:
Simon Lin
Defendant:
Lin & Longs Corporation doing business as China Star, Mei Long Dong, Shi Lin Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
VASQUEZ et al v. ALTICE USA, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv20674
Plaintiff:
NICK VASQUEZ, ANNETTE BAKER, JEFF LAMOREE and others
Defendant:
ALTICE USA, INC., CEBRIDGE TELECOM CA, LLC (D/B/A/ SUDDENLINK COMMUNICATIONS), CSC HOLDINGS, LLC (D/B/A OPTIMUM) and others
Intervenor Defendant:
MADISON, WV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Purple Innovation v. Bedmate-U et al
as 2:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Purple Innovation
Defendant:
Bedmate-U, Chuang Fan Handicraft, Dongguan Bounce Technology and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Concepcion et al v. Altice USA et al
as 1:2022cv04308
Plaintiff:
Natividad Concepcion, Xue Shi Lin and Jesse Friedman
Defendant:
Altice USA and CSC Holdings, Inc doing business as Optimum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lin v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv03193
Plaintiff:
Shi Lin
Defendant:
US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas and Patricia A. Menges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv08322
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Shuyi Zhou and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
He et al v. New Mei Shi Lin Eastern Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00713
Plaintiff:
Jian Bin Chen, Hong Ying He and Gen Rong Wen
Defendant:
Jian Qing Chen, Jun Qiang Chen, New Mei Shi Lin Eastern Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
