Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Stephens v. MCCollum et al
as 1:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stephens
Defendant:
John Musso, Graham Hoffman, Michael McCollum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shock v. Dedeke et al
as 5:2021cv03263
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Shock
Defendant:
Andrew Dedeke, Eric Thorne and Mallissa Wardrop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chiras v. Shock et al
as 1:2021cv01397
Plaintiff:
Skyler Chiras
Defendant:
Annabelle Flores and Shock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hild v. United Sports Brand et al
as 2:2021cv00108
Defendant:
Shock Doctor Inc doing business as Shock Doctor, United Sports Brand and Dick's Sporting Goods Inc doing business as Dick's Sporting Goods
Plaintiff:
Robert Hild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shock v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
Sloan L. Shock
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hughes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02454
Plaintiff:
Susan Hughes , Kimberly Kerby , Shirley Buerman and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Frantz et al
as 1:2013cv00370
Plaintiff:
Alexisius Jones
Defendant:
Paula Frantz, Tom Clements, Janice Eads and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Auto Owners Insurance v. Christensen et al
as 2:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Auto Owners Insurance
Defendant:
Colton Christensen, Christensen Ready Mix and Brooke Shock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Shock et al v. American Medical Systems et al
as 2:2012cv00639
Plaintiff:
Lynell A. Shock and Duane Shock
Defendant:
American Medical Systems and Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
