Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Penrose Collateral, LLC et al v. City of Tulsa, The et al
as 4:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Penrose Collateral, LLC a Domestic Limited Liability Company doing business as Penrose Pawnshop 2 and Michael Eric Garman
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, Wendell Franklin, Thomas Shockley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gates et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Robert Gates, Rita Gates and Julio Melendez
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Samantha Ramsey, Don Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burkhalter v. Gray et al
as 4:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Marquise Burkhalter
Defendant:
Kevin Gray, Grace Hobbs, Adam J Derycke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inkton v. Titus et al
as 4:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lavell Inkton
Defendant:
Savannah Titus, Steve Kunzweiler and Madison Shockley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Northwest Rogers County Fire Protection District et al
as 4:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Debra M Cooper
Defendant:
Northwest Rogers County Fire Protection District , James Mathew Shockley, Mel W Dainty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price et al v. Public Service Company of Oklahoma
as 4:2013cv00514
Plaintiff:
Steve A Price , Bobby L Erwin , John Harn and others
Defendant:
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Shockley v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Linus E Shockley, Sr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shockley et al v. Waurika City of et al
as 5:2010cv00517
Plaintiff:
Trey Shockley and Zackary Shockley
Defendant:
Waurika City of and Waurika Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McClure v. Shockley
as 4:2007cv00587
Plaintiff:
Daniel McClure
Defendant:
Dennis Shockley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
