Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shook v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00489
Petitioner:
Michael Sean Shook
Respondent:
Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shook et al v. Gleue Harvesting, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Erica Shook and David Shook
Defendant:
Gleue Harvesting, LLC a/k/a and/or d/b/a Gleue Harvesting a/k/a and/or d/b/a Gleue a/k/a and/or d/b/a - Gleue Harvesting - Gleue, Gleue Trucking, LLC a/k/a and/or d/b/a Gleue Trucking a/k/a and/or d/b/a - Gleue Trucking, Gleue Farms, LLC a/k/a and/or d/b/a Gleue Farms a/k/a and/or d/b/a - Gleue Farms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Taylor v. Sherman City of et al
as 5:2020cv00139
Defendant:
FNU LNU, Amos L Mazzant, III, Carol M Siebman and others
Plaintiff:
Harmon L Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
Raithiele Jon Robinson
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Okmulgee County District Court, Ken Adair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Institutional Gang Investigations Unit et al
as 5:2013cv00351
Plaintiff:
Marco Gomez
Defendant:
Institutional Gang Investigations Unit, F Luna, L Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shook et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00722
Plaintiff:
Kathy Shook and Roger Shook
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Inc. and Nielson Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Shook v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 4:2009cv00509
Plaintiff:
Kathy Shook
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
