Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clemens v. Guyton et al
as 1:2021cv01367
Plaintiff:
Russell Clemens
Defendant:
Ronda Guyton, Jana Huston, . Riegelien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Guyton et al
as 1:2021cv01337
Plaintiff:
Corey Brooks
Defendant:
Ronda Guyton, . Turner, . Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Shubert
as 1:2017cv01016
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Debra K Shubert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shubert v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00468
Plaintiff:
Scott Shubert
Defendant:
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trustees of the Cement Masons Pension Fund, Local 502 et al v. Rae's Concrete, Inc.. et al
as 1:2013cv09028
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Cement Masons Pension Fund, Local 502 , Trustees of the Cement Masons Institute of Chicago, Illinois , Trustees of the Cement Masons Savings Fund, Local 502 and others
Defendant:
Rae's Concrete, Inc. and Shubert And Son, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Shubert v. Doe(s), et al
as 1:2013cv06505
Plaintiff:
Ken Shubert
Defendant:
John Doe(s), Jane Doe(s) and Unknown DCFS Workers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Shubert v. Kendall County Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv02083
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Shubert
Defendant:
Kendall County Corrections, Kendall County Sheriff's, Medical Staff - Contracted Healtcare Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shumpert et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv04425
Plaintiff:
Everett Drayden Shumpert and Hebrew Methodological Institute
Defendant:
The United States of America, Barack Obama, Richard Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
