Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 374
Jesse Perez v. Mohammed Siddiqui
as 24-1766
Plaintiff: JESSE R. PEREZ
Defendant: MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Medical Director, Wexford
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Eller et al v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv50149
Plaintiff: Kathleen Eller and Eller Timothy
Defendant: Jewel Food Stores, Inc., New Albertson's Inc. an Ohio Corporation doing business as Jewel-Osco and American Drug Stores, LLC doing business as Osco Drug #3503
Respondent: Dr. Husna Siddiqui
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Charles Thornton v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-1538
Plaintiff: CHARLES E. THORNTON
Defendant: WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., MARY JO ZIMMER, Nurse Practitioner, HCU at Menard CC and MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI
Steven Murphy v. Mohammed Siddiqui, et al
as 24-1505
Plaintiff: STEVEN MURPHY
Defendant: MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, ANTHONY WILLS and ANGELA CRAIN
Steven Murphy v. Mohammed Siddiqui, et al
as 24-1506
Plaintiff: STEVEN MURPHY
Defendant: MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Doctor and ANTHONY WILLS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00596
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Siddiqui v. Keating et al
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff: Raza Siddiqui
Defendant: Patrick Keating, Charles Braico, NABET-CWA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Type: Labor Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?