Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Martinez v. Kahl et al
as 8:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez
Defendant:
Larry W. Kahl, Don Whitmire, Kris Boe Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Liewer et al
as 8:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Carroll
Defendant:
Cameron Liewer, Andrew Corbin, Brittany Marker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Dawson et al
as 8:2020cv00408
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez
Respondent:
Tom Barr, Group Facilitator, Mark Labouchardier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Nebraska Department of Correction Services et al
as 8:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Spence Propel, Dayna, Brandi and others
Plaintiff:
Marvel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanko v. Smith, King, Simmons, & Conn Law Firm et al
as 7:2020cv05005
Defendant:
Dennis King, Smith, King, Simmons, & Conn Law Firm, Michael Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Rudy Stanko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Barr et al
as 8:2020cv00272
Respondent:
Diane Schumaker, Tabetha E. Waggoner, Tom Barr and others
Petitioner:
Adrian Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wiley v. Norfolk Regional Center et al
as 8:2020cv00147
Defendant:
Kriss Boe Simmons, Mike Eppman, Tom Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Journey v. Ricketts et al
as 8:2020cv00040
Respondent:
Tom Barr, John H. Marsh, Richard Beecher and others
Petitioner:
Ricky G. Journey
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Narcisse v. Reyolds et al
as 8:2019cv00130
Defendant:
Spence Propel, John Reyolds, Kristi J. Egger and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Narcisse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Narcisse v. Kubes et al
as 8:2019cv00018
Defendant:
Spence Propel, Don Whittmore, Norfolk Regional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Narcisse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
