Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Sizemore v. Manchester Square Associates, LLC. et al
as 6:2019cv00222
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Sizemore
Defendant:
Manchester Square Associates, LLC. and Wal-Mart East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sizemore v. SSA
as 2:2019cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey H. Sizemore
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Butler v. Gaddius et al
as 6:2019cv00182
Respondent:
Dr. Parson, Huges, Officer Trett and others
Petitioner:
Mikle Anthony Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Butler v. Trett et al
as 6:2019cv00187
Respondent:
Dr. Parson, Warden Kizzian, Officer Sizemore and others
Petitioner:
Mikle Anthony Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sizemore v. USA
as 6:2018cv00162
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Patrick Wayne Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sizemore v SSA
as 6:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Sizemore
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Zachary Crouch vs Terry Hale, et al.
as 6:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Zachary Crouch
Defendant:
Terry Hale , Sheila Hale , American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hoskins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 6:2017cv00304
3Rd Party Defendant:
James River Coal, Smith Brothers Excavating, Transcoal Coal Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Sizemore, Clifford Hoskins and Bud Napier
Defendant:
Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC, Kentucky Mine Supply Company and Mine Service Company, Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McKinney v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00543
Plaintiff:
Robert Willis McKinney
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, James Erwin, Gregory S. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
