Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WESTERN SURETY COMPANY v. MAGEE EXCAVATION & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 3:2023cv24729
Plaintiff:
WESTERN SURETY COMPANY
Defendant:
Magee Excavation & Development, LLC, Magee Equipment, LLC, Magee Builders, LLC and others
Intervenor:
First Horizon Bank
DEBUSK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33996
Plaintiff:
SKIP DEBUSK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christian v. Cooper et al
as 6:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
David Christian
Defendant:
Thomas Cooper, Michael Wood, Ryan Meehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Intech Innovation Holdings, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv01874
Defendant:
James Marshall II, Charles Anthony Griess, Intech Innovation Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Blair Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUGHMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31040
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SKIP BAUGHMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walsh v. Columbus Consolidated Government et al
as 8:2020cv00794
Defendant:
Columbus Consolidated Government, Susan Henderson, Columbus Water Works and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv61923
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BAUCHAM v. FRANKLIN COUNTY GOV ENTITY et al
as 4:2015cv00511
Plaintiff:
WILLIE FRED BAUCHAM
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY GOV ENTITY, SKIP SHIVER, MICHAEL DUHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
