Cases 1 - 10 of 366
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Williams v. Abbott et al
as 3:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Williams
Defendant:
Gregg Abbott, Ken Paxton, Sharon Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv12720
Plaintiff:
Tyrone A. Bell
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Matt McCauley, Rander Rewers and others
MCKENZIE v. BARTON et al
as 5:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
MARY BARTON, JAMES SKIPPER, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neill v. Teeter et al
as 5:2023cv03143
Plaintiff:
Chase Neill
Defendant:
Holly Teeter, Stephen Hunting, Skipper Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
David Lack v. Posner, et al
as 23-55522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LACK and DAVID JAMES LACK
Defendant / Appellee:
POSNER, Dr; CTF Soledad Prison Chief Medical Officer, BRIAN COTA, DDA, CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden, CTF Soledad Warden and others
Neill v. Hunting et al
as 5:2023cv03131
Plaintiff:
Chase Neill
Defendant:
Stephen Hunting, Holly Teeter, Skipper Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Neill v. Maag et al
as 5:2023cv03126
Plaintiff:
Chase Neill
Defendant:
Jared Maag, Skipper Jacobs, Stephen Hunting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
