Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nash et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00769
Plaintiff:
Ora Washington, Nancy Stratton, Linda Schuetz and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., PTI Royston, LLC d/b/a Pharma Tech Industries, PTI Union, LLC d/b/a Pharma Tech Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Skipper v. Thoennes
as 2:2014cv04027
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Defendant:
C Thoennes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skipper v. Cassady et al
as 2:2013cv04263
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Defendant:
Jay Cassady, Michelle Balman, Gracie Humphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skipper v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv05100
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Defendant:
Brian Smith, Nancy A McKerrow, Mark Grothoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skipper v. Norman
as 4:2012cv00804
Petitioner:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Respondent:
Jeff Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Skipper v. Dormire et al
as 4:2011cv00727
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Defendant:
David Dormire, George Lombardi and Daniel R Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Skipper v. Dormire
as 4:2010cv00936
Petitioner:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Respondent:
David Dormire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Skipper v. Jefferson City Correctional Center et al
as 2:2009cv04004
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Defendant:
Jefferson City Correctional Center, David Dormire, J Cassady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skipper v. Lawrence County Circuit Court
as 4:2008cv00193
Petitioner:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Respondent:
Lawrence County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Amos et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 4:2007cv01779
Plaintiff:
Aaron Amos, Aaron Amos, AIM, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer CropScience AG, Bayer Cropscience Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
