Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hines v. Legal Services Superior Court et al
as 3:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Marquse BT Hines and Marquese T Hines
Defendant:
Legal Services Superior Court, Fairfield County Superior Court, Hirfera Healthcare Bridgeport and others
Hines et al v. 17 of European Charleston CAC the Other et al
as 3:2022cv00870
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines and Shameka Hines
Defendant:
Yale New Haven Hospital, Bridgeport Hospital, Caucasian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines et al v. Columbia et al
as 3:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines and Shameka Hines
Defendant:
District of Columbia and Skull & Bones Associations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines et al v. Skull & Bones Associations et al
as 3:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Skull & Bones Associations, Bridgeport Hospital/Yale New Haven Hospital and New Haven Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hines v. Bridgeport Hospital et al
as 3:2022cv00622
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Bridgeport Hospital, Skull & Bones Associations, Bridgeport Police and others
Hines, et al v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
United States, Bridgeport Hospital, Saint Vincents Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hines v. Bridgeport Hospital et al
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Bridgeport Hospital, Yale New Haven Hospital, Skull & Bones Association and others
Igarashi v. Skulls & Bone
as 10-3396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tomoko Igarashi, 1223-16 Kamikoya Yachiyo City Chiba Prefecture Japan
Defendant - Appellee:
Skulls & Bones, (Institution), George W. Bush, George Herbert Walker Bush and others
Igarashi v. Skulls & Bones et al
as 1:2010cv05586
Plaintiff:
Tomoko Igarashi
Defendant:
Skulls & Bones, George W. Bush, George Herbert Walker Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
