Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wright v. Skyline Security Management Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01840
Defendant:
Skyline Security Management, Inc. a California for-profit corporation licensed to do business in Washington State also known as Skyline Security doing business as Brinks Home Security, Skyline Security, Monitronics International LLC a Texas limited liability company licensed to do business in Washington State doing business as Brinks Home and others
Plaintiff:
Chris W. Wright and Chris W Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04795
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Skyline Security Management, Inc. et al v. Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2018cv02712
Plaintiff:
Edwin Arroyave and Skyline Security Management, Inc.
Defendant:
DOES and Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company
ADT Services, et al v. Skyline Security Management Inc., et al
as 2:2012cv04156
Plaintiff:
ADT Security Services, Inc. and ADT Services A.G.
Defendant:
Addison Ammo, Edwin Arroyave, Ali Batiara and others
ADT Services A.G. et al v. Skyline Security Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2012at00421
Plaintiff:
ADT Services A.G. and ADT Security Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Skyline Security Management, Inc., Edwin Arroyave, Victor Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
ADT Services, et al v. Skyline Security Management Inc., et al
as 2:2012cv00828
Plaintiff:
ADT Services A.G. and ADT Security Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Skyline Security Management, Inc. , Edwin Arroyave , Victor Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
