Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00560
Defendant:
Trudy Gilmond, David Kettner, David Sorrells and others
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com and Matthew E. Orso
(PC) Slay v. Superior Court of California et al
as 2:2020cv01591
Plaintiff:
Michael Slay
Defendant:
Rio Consumnes Correctional Center, Superior Court of California and County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GE Capital Commercial of Utah LLC v. Slay et al
as 2:2015cv02041
Plaintiff:
GE Capital Commercial of Utah LLC
Defendant:
Kelley D Slay, Richard Spillett and Ram Gunabalan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slay v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2015cv01315
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2015at00707
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and Mark A. Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Slay v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2014cv01416
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slay v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2014at00681
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark A Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loretta Curley et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01876
Plaintiff:
Janet Anglin, Ruby Barnes, Ira Bennett and others
Defendant:
John Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
Slay v. Grounds
as 3:2010cv00601
Petitioner:
Charles M Slay
Respondent:
R. Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
