Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,857
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff: DeAerre Smith
Defendant: Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02079
Plaintiff: Paul C Smith
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff: DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant: Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00776
Petitioner: Maurice Freeman
Respondent: Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Babeneau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff: James A. Babeneau
Defendant: Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Mapleton Local School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Mapleton Local School District, Mapleton Local School District Board of Education, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2024cv02006
Interested Party: State of Ohio
Plaintiff: Antonio Henderson
Defendant: Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shank v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00745
Plaintiff: Patrick J. Shank
Defendant: Shelby W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Smith v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: Jason Smith
Defendant: PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Pointer v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01807
Plaintiff: Dennis Pointer
Defendant: Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Ron O'Brian, Michael Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?