Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13073
Defendant:
ROBERT TOOLE, KENDRIC JACKSON, JUANITA SHARPE and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Waseem Daker v. Warden Smith State Prison
as 24-12659
Petitioner:
WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
WARDEN SMITH STATE PRISON
Argueta v. Smith State Prison et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Defendant:
John Doe (2), John Doe (3), John Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Enio Humberto Argueta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerome Coast, Jr. v. Michael Hartmeyer, et al
as 23-13502
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME COAST, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HARTMEYER, WARDEN SMITH STATE PRISON, JACKSON and others
Jamalson v. Smith State Prison
as 1:2023cv03535
Plaintiff:
David Jamalson
Defendant:
Smith State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flournoy v. Smith State Prison et al
as 6:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Johnny Dewayne Flournoy
Defendant:
Smith State Prison and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Long
Defendant:
Warden Beasley, Commissary Dept. Workers, Food Service Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin et al v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D. Franklin and Timothy Long
Defendant:
Warden Beasley, Commissary Dept. Workers, Food Service Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamalson v. Smith State Prison
as 1:2023cv02332
Plaintiff:
David Jamalson
Defendant:
Smith State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOONS, Facilities Director, ROBERT TOOLE, Field Operations Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
