Cases 1 - 10 of 5,515
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Douglas Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Osmanovic v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Merima Osmanovic
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Katie Rygmyr v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-2005
Plaintiff:
Katie Rygmyr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Ford v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Erica Ford
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Carlton v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Karen Lea Carlton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Wolfe v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Wolfe
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Rau v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Kayla Rau
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murray v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Murray
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Karen Littrell v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1923
Plaintiff:
Karen D. Littrell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Burke v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Jared J. Burke
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
