Cases 21 - 30 of 46
KENNEDY et al v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2019cv01720
Defendant:
DAVID FRANTZ, ESTATE OF JL CHESNUTT, DAVID BRODERICK and others
Plaintiff:
COREY LEA and WILLIE CHARLES KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WATSON et al v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2019cv01633
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Plaintiff:
Fitzgerald Watson, Deborah Watson, Troy Watson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01558
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WOOD v. PERDUE
as 1:2019cv01190
Plaintiff:
DUANE WOOD
Defendant:
SONNY PERDUE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Cecil Brewington v. Sonny Perdue
as 19-5027
Defendant / Appellee:
Sonny Perdue, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture
Undetermined:
Maurice McGinnis, by his conservator Derrick K. Jones
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Cecil Brewington, et, al
CLARK v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2019cv00394
Defendant:
SONNY PERDUE and WINONA LAKE SCOTT
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE CLARK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Timothy Pigford v. Sonny Perdue
as 19-5023
Defendant / Appellee:
Sonny Perdue, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Timothy C. Pigford, et al.
Undetermined:
Maurice McGinnis, by his conservator Derrick K. Jones
American Anti-Vivisection Soc, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 19-5015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
American Anti-Vivisection Society and Avian Welfare Coalition
Defendant / Appellee:
Sonny Perdue, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Agriculture and United States Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
