Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bey v. Jordan et al
as 3:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Chief Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III, Judge Henry T. Wingate, Judge Carlton W. Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bey v. Boone et al
as 3:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
Richard Amum'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Magistrate Steven Boone, State of Mississippi, Phil Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
New Horizon Church International v. Philadelphia Insurance Companies et al
as 3:2014cv00937
Plaintiff:
New Horizon Church International
Defendant:
Philadelphia Insurance Companies , Brent L. Bowers, Sorrells, Bowers, and Coats, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sorrell v. Rinehart et al
as 1:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Sorrell
Defendant:
Charles Rinehart , Scott A. Brown and Alcorn County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QBE Insurance Corporation v. Sorrell et al
as 1:2009cv00041
Plaintiff:
QBE Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Roy Sorrell, Lashunda Sorrell, Dannie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Liston Lancaster, PLLC et al v. David P. Matthews, P.C. et al
as 3:2007cv00131
Plaintiff:
Liston Lancaster, PLLC, Liston Lancaster, PLLC, David H. Nutt, P.A. and others
Defendant:
David P. Matthews, P.C., David P. Matthews, Nick C. Nichols, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Blanks et al
as 4:2007cv00158
Plaintiff:
Katie Blanks, Thomas Brown, Estate of Doris Burnett and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Herring, et al v. Metropolitan Life, et al
as 1:2000cv00486
Plaintiff:
Joe Turner, Billy Joe Peek, James Alton Connally and others
Defendant:
Standard Equipment Company, Inc., Garlock, Inc., CRS, America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
