Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Sosa v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Maryann Sosa
Defendant:
Cody Allen Johnson, Texas Industrial Choice, LLC and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lopez-Acevedo v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00333
Defendant:
Elaine Ramirez, Dave Smith, Rich Sosa and others
Plaintiff:
Cruz Lopez-Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Sosa v. Mahone et al
as 1:2019cv01212
Defendant:
Mark Mahone, Christopher King, Michael Burkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Teddy R Sosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sosa v. State of New Mexico
as 2:2019cv00752
Plaintiff:
Manuel Naranjo Sosa
Defendant:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
Susan Hernandez
Defendant:
United States of America, Gabriel Sosa and Westech International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Sosa v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00653
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Sosa
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
A.L. v. Bernalillo County et al
as 1:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
A. L.
Defendant:
Bernalillo County, Art de la Cruz, Maggie Hart-Stebbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sosa v. State of New Mexico Department of Health and Human Services
as 2:2016cv00218
Plaintiff:
Manuel N Sosa
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Springfield Armory XD Pistol et al,
as 1:2013cv01088
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Benjamin Sosa and Audrey R Sosa
Defendant:
Springfield Armory XD Pistol and 19 Rounds Blazer Ammunition
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
