Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. MoneyLion Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08308
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Defendant:
MoneyLion Technologies Inc., ML Plus, LLC, MoneyLion of Alabama LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 85 National Banks: Rate of Interest on Loans, Discounts, and Purchases
Akers v. Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc., et al
as 1:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
SONYA AKERS as Personal Representative of the Estate of ANTHONY RICARDO JENNINGS a/k/a ANTHONY JENNINGS, deceased, and SONYA AKERS, individually and Sonya Akers
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., d/b/a ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF NEW YORK a, VANTAGE POINT SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a VANTAGE POINT SOLUTIONS OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc., doing business as Armstrong Telecommunications of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Estate of Silvestre Quebrado et al v. Macquarie Corporate and Asset Funding, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Estate of Silvestre Quebrado, Thalia Quebrado, Delia Quebrado and others
Defendant:
Macquarie Corporate and Asset Funding, Inc., Macquarie Equipment Capital, Inc., Equipmentshare.com Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
The State Of Texas, et al v. Google, LLC
as 1:2021cv06841
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas, State of Arkansas, State of Idaho and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Amicus Curiae:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at Fed. Question: Anti-trust
In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2021md03010
Plaintiff:
Associated Newspapers Ltd., Mail Media, Inc., Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and others
Interpleader:
State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Interested Party:
The Nation Company, L.P., Genius Media Group, Inc., Mikula Web Solutions, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Plutzer v. Bankers Trust Company of South Dakota et al
as 1:2021cv03632
Defendant:
Haresh Tharani, Scott Kane, Michael Setola and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Plutzer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
State of New York v. United States Department of Education et al
as 1:2020cv04260
Defendant:
United States Department of Education and Elisabeth DeVos
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK and The Board of Education for the City School District of the City of New York
Amicus Curiae:
Association of Public and Land-grant Universities, AASA, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Clervrain v. Cissna et al
as 1:2020cv02197
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, United Nations (U.N.) and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pizzabov, Inc. et. al. v. Visa International Service Association et. al.
as 2:2020cv01517
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, (USA), N.A., Bank of America Corp., Visa International Service Assocation and others
Plaintiff:
1SaleADay, Octagon Commerce, LLC, East New York Kosler, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
