Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Fiorito v. Rice et al
as 0:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Defendant:
Doctor Rice, Jenefer Southwick, Mr. Drummy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Bennett et al
as 0:2023cv01605
Plaintiff:
Michael Mackey
Defendant:
P. Bennett, J. Southwick, M. Fuayah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Block v. Fikes
as 0:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
J Fikes, Acting Warden, Acting Associate Warden's 1,2,3. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiorito v. Southwick et al
as 0:2022cv02128
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Defendant:
P.A. Jenefer Southwick and Officer Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiorito v. Mr. Drummy et al
as 0:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Defendant:
Mr. Drummy, Ms. Oetterer, Ms. Southwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mancini v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2020cv02532
Defendant:
Jenefer Southwick, Dr. Jarod Broadway, Dr. Mayer and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Ferbo Mancini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal v. Johnson et al
as 0:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Charles Ricardo O'Neal
Defendant:
Brenda Johnson, Amy Johnson, Mandac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sufka v. Barney et al
as 0:2008cv01504
Plaintiff:
Alfred John Sufka
Defendant:
Sharon Barney, Jeniffer Southwick and Minnesota Department of Corrections Health Services Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe H. Bandy-Bey v. Robert Feneis, et al
as 08-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joe H. Bandy-Bey
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Feneis, Jennifer Southwick, Denise Barger and others
James Wayne Frye v. Minnesota Dept. of Corrections
as 08-1279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Wayne Frye
Defendant - Appellee:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Jennifer Southwick, C. Kruger and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
