Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mark Mazza, et al v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp, et al
as 23-2300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK MAZZA and LISA MAZZA
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP, DBA Bank of New York Mellon, BANK OF AMERICA NA, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP and others
LAWRENCE v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv02829
Plaintiff:
ANDREA LAWRENCE
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP FKA COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP and SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MAZZA et al v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv03253
Plaintiff:
MARK MAZZA, LISA MAZZA and SOPHIA MAZZA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10, MERSCORP HOLDINGS INC., BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINSTON v. WELLS FARGO NA et al
as 3:2019cv08805
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC. and WELLS FARGO NA
Plaintiff:
HALL ANTHONY WINSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALBERT v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 3:2019cv00074
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE HUDSON ALBERT
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 4.48 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 8.29 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-18-9 et al
as 3:2018cv02001
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 4.48 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 8.29 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-18-9, RONALD KAPPUS, JOHANNA KAPPUS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
WASHINGTON v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
GORDON A. WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC , THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and CWABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
