Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 71
McElmeel v. Perlow et al
as 6:2024cv00651
Plaintiff: Samuel Peter McElmeel
Defendant: Patricia W. Perlow, Eric T Knapp, Spencer Gwartney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Tallman v. Spencer
as 2:2023cv01773
Plaintiff: Jonathan Tallman
Defendant: Dillon Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Barrett v. Harrold
as 6:2023cv01398
Petitioner: Spencer Joseph Barrett
Respondent: Sheriff Clifton Harrold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shibahara v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv01272
Plaintiff: Elizabeth K. Shibahara
Defendant: State of Oregon, Holly Catalina, Laura Ramirez Marin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Yamhill County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00911
Plaintiff: Renee Warren
Defendant: Yamhill County, Tim Svenson, Michael Petrasek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00755
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Barrett v. Harrold
as 6:2023cv00738
Petitioner: Spencer Joseph Barrett
Respondent: Sheriff Clifton Harrold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 3:2023cv00569
Plaintiff: Jacqueline E. Spencer
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mendez-Ordonez v. Grubb
as 3:2022cv01853
Plaintiff: Rodolfo Mendez-Ordonez
Defendant: Spencer Grubb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?