Cases 11 - 20 of 944
Grant et al v. River Springs Center, LLC
as 1:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
Tatiquana Grant and Mandi's Salon & Spa, LLC
Defendant:
River Springs Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company v. Future Management Company, LLC
as 1:2024cv21317
Plaintiff:
Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Future Management Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
The Lamar Company, LLC v. Goshen Springs Property III, LLC
as 24-10892
Plaintiff:
THE LAMAR COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
GOSHEN SPRINGS PROPERTY III, LLC
Physician's Central Business Office & Affiliates, et al v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 24-10817
Plaintiff:
PHYSICIAN'S CENTRAL BUSINESS OFFICE & AFFILIATES, MARIA CRISTINA CRESPO-SMITH, NESTOR JAVECH and others
Defendant:
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON
Murray v. Southern Springs 401(k) Retirement Plan et al
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Naziree Murray
Defendant:
Southern Springs 401(k) Retirement Plan and Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
