Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Brandenburg Telephone Company v. Sprint Communications Company, L.P.
as 23-5369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDENBURG TELEPHONE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. United Telephone Company of Ohio et al
as 1:2014cv01380
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Defendant:
United Telephone Company of Ohio, Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Telephone Service Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Chillicothe Telephone Company et al
as 2:2014cv00610
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Defendant:
Chillicothe Telephone Company and Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sprint Communications Company, LP v. ACE Telephone Company of Michigan, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00565
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company, LP
Defendant:
ACE Telephone Company of Michigan, Inc., Allendale Telephone Company, Drenthe Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151
Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company et al
as 2:2014cv12087
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Defendant:
Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Clear Rate Communications, Inc., D&P Communications, Inc. and others
Michigan Bell Telephone Company v. Isiogu et al
as 2:2009cv12577
Plaintiff:
Michigan Bell Telephone Company
Defendant:
Orjiakor N Isiogu, Monica Martinez, Steven A Transeth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Type:
Contract
Brandenburg Telephone Company v. Sprint Communications Company LP
as 3:2009cv00109
Plaintiff:
Brandenburg Telephone Company, Brandenburg Telephone Company and Brandenburg Telephone Company
Defendant:
Sprint Communications Company LP and Sprint Communications Company LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
