Cases 21 - 30 of 174
Speakes v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv01413
Petitioner:
Joshua S Speakes
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Browne v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv01247
Petitioner:
Zachary Lee Browne
Respondent:
D. Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robert Decker v. Katherine Sireveld, et al
as 23-1725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE SIREVELD, Legal Deprtment of terre Haute & Marion F.C.I.'s, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Villasenor v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv01179
Petitioner:
Enrique Santana Villasenor
Respondent:
D. Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Drew v. Murphy et al
as 3:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Andre' Drew
Defendant:
Murphy, Shaw, Gauthier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robert Decker v. Dan Sproul
as 23-1585
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN SPROUL
Christy v. Sproul et al
as 3:2023cv00888
Petitioner:
Shawn R. Christy
Respondent:
Dan Sproul, Mrs. C. Sozal and Kirsten Nielson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gary v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
James L. Gary
Defendant:
USA, Kathy Hill, Dan Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garrison v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv00732
Petitioner:
Ricky Garrison
Respondent:
Warden Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DECKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLLETTE PETERS, SARA QURESHI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
