Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Jett v. Rivard et al
as 2:2013cv12524
Petitioner:
Glenn Jett
Respondent:
Steven Rivard and St. Louis Correctional Facility
Ragland v. St. Louis, City of et al
as 2:2013cv11695
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ragland
Defendant:
St. Louis, City of, Velsicol Chemical Corporation, NW-1 Inc and others
Booker v. Dell et al
as 5:2012cv14757
Plaintiff:
Kirt Booker
Defendant:
Unknown Dell and St Louis Correctional Facility
Booker #345215 v. Dell et al
as 1:2012cv01110
Plaintiff:
Kirt Booker #345215
Defendant:
Unknown Dell and St. Louis Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. St. Louis, City of et al
as 2:2012cv10528
Plaintiff:
Paul Davis
Defendant:
St. Louis, City of, Patricia Caruso, Nick Ludwick and others
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc. v. Cutlip et al
as 1:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc.
Defendant:
Brent Cutlip , Local Mooving Company, The and St. Louis Orlando Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curry #180428 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Curry #180428
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Kalamazoo Probation Enhancement Program, Sherron Rimpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ragland v. St Louis, City of et al
as 2:2010cv13484
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ragland
Defendant:
St Louis, City of, Nick Ludwick, Ross and others
Crosset Company, LLC v. St. Louis I.G.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv12130
Plaintiff:
Crosset Company, LLC
Defendant:
St. Louis I.G.A., Inc. and Kenneth R Zoppa
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al v. Cobo Center et al
as 2:2010cv10194
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, James St. Louis and Nupur Modi
Defendant:
Cobo Center, Tom Tuskey, Walter C Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
