Cases 11 - 20 of 29
HERZ v. HAMILTON et al
as 1:2015cv00161
Defendant:
GREGORY BALLARD, GERALD BEPKO, SUSAN BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HERZ v. PFENNINGER et al
as 1:2014cv02001
Defendant:
GREGORY BALLARD, SUSAN BROOKS, MICHAEL DELPH and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
SRIVASTAVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01383
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO, JAY BRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SRIVASTAVA v. COLLEGE PARK CLUB, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00717
Defendant:
GREGORY BALLARD, MARK BANNATYNE, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PIKE TOWNSHIP and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SRIVASTAVA v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2012cv01309
Defendant:
JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
