Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brad Stevens v. MN Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 21-2055
Defendant / Appellee:
Jane and John Does, all in their official and individual capacities, Ryan Chukuske, Stacey Sonnek and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brad Ronald Stevens
Bishop v. Mesojedec et al
as 0:2019cv00794
Defendant:
Nicole Smith, Chad Mesojedec, Jessica Geil and others
Plaintiff:
Merel Evans Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daywitt et al v. Mesojedec et al
as 0:2017cv05015
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steven Daywitt, Merel Evans Bishop and Bet Elohim Congregation
Defendant:
Chad Mesojedec, Karen Dalluge, Jessica Geil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, The Institute For Psychological & Sexual Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eberhardt v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00942
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bruce Eberhardt
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Parsons, Jr.
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00550
Plaintiff:
Terry Ray Jackson
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00504
Plaintiff:
Anthony Green
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linehan v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00423
Plaintiff:
Dennis Linehan
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Swanson et al
as 0:2011cv03711
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Carey
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
