Cases 41 - 50 of 57
STAFFORD v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE STAFFORD
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and Mentor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stafford et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
Patricia Stafford and James Stafford
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Future Management Corporation v. Exemplary Development Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00363
Plaintiff:
Future Management Corporation
Defendant:
Exemplary Development Corporation, Michele V. Pannell, Robert L. Pannell and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
VanZant v. Kerr et al
as 4:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joe VanZant
Defendant:
George Stafford Kerr and Ms. Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bleach v. Stafford Foods Inc
as 1:2009cv00184
Plaintiff:
Gayla Annette Bleach and Gayla Annette Bleach
Defendant:
Stafford Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stafford v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2009cv02156
Plaintiff:
Tammy Stafford
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type:
Other Statutes
Stafford v. Ammons et al
as 4:2009cv00112
Petitioner:
Tyron Stafford
Respondent:
Thomas Ammons and Terry Duffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stafford v. Ammons et al
as 5:2009cv00208
Petitioner:
Tyron Stafford
Respondent:
Thomas Ammons and Terry Duffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stafford v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2008cv03397
Plaintiff:
Charles Stafford
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
